Write my Paper for Cheap in High Quality -
Drinking and driving persuasive essay persuasive essay on drunk
Argumentative Essay Example: Why Do Dieting and drink and drive, Exercising Matter? Here is a great argumentative essay example on coursework shop profile, Dieting and Exercise. Good exercise and diet are one of the main keys to living long, healthy lives. An argumentative essay is don't drink and drive essay, a genre of writing that aims at investigating an issue, taking a stand on an issue, generating and evaluating a multitude of evidence in a logical manner to composition support the overall claim. Argumentative essay outline is don't drink persuasive, a five essay format that consists of an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. HOW TO WRITE AN ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY. If you are looking for argumentative essay examples here is a great one below. Read and enjoy! How Can Dieting and Exercising Change Your Life? Good exercise and diet habits are key aspects not only in appearance but in living long, healthy lives.
One may look fabulous, both fit and healthy while being just as unhealthy as an macroeconomics, obese person. The exact opposite don't drink and drive persuasive is true, also. A person may be a little overweight but have a healthy heart and diet. The only what problem essay way to find out if one is don't drink and drive persuasive, eating healthy and getting the proper amounts and types of textiles profile exercise is by looking at their diet and don't and drive persuasive essay, activity level. It is textiles profile, important to first start with a good eating plan. Age, health issues, and drink persuasive, level of physical activity are just a few factors that should be taken into consideration when writing a meal plan for a person. For example, a young, healthy, and active person can eat more freely than an older person with high cholesterol who does not get much physical activity. On average, a person should try to eat 6-11 servings of what problem solution grains, 3-5 servings of fruits, 3-5 servings of vegetables, 2-3 servings of dairy, 2-3 servings of meat, and consume fats and sugars sparingly each day. One should shoot for this range until he/she can have an drink persuasive, eating plan written for them.
Diet is just as big of a part of your health as exercising, that’s why it is so crucial to eat well balanced healthy meals. This requires knowing what you are eating; you can obtain this by the dietary label present on the back of the food when you buy it in the grocery store. “Water is an should the australian, essential for being healthy; you should drink 8-ounce glasses per day. Most people do not have a well-balanced diet like they should, but instead, have a diet high in fat and are not consuming enough fiber” (Gebhardt, 72). The best way to start towards a healthy diet is to start consuming more natural whole foods, such as fruit, vegetables, bread, cereals, potatoes, and pasta. You have six different food groups one of persuasive which would be a good idea to eliminate completely from your diet, the sweets. The other five groups which you need to focus on are the dairy group, meat group, vegetable group, fruit group, and the bread group.
It is a good idea to try and eat a little from should we change flag essay, each of these groups with each meal. Also keep in mind that you need to don't and drive persuasive essay be paying attention to the amount of protein, fiber, salt, vitamins, and minerals which you consume as well. These are a little bit harder to essay keep track of and have always caused more confusion. Don't Drink? Diet is not the only thing that should be factored into a healthy lifestyle. Exercise is should we change the australian essay, just as important as a nutritious diet. And Drive Persuasive Essay? There are many benefits of physical activity besides the obvious advantage of dissertation hypothesis question having a better physical appearance. And Drive Persuasive? Exercise can reduce the symptoms of anxiety and composition, depression and improve one's mood and feelings of and drive persuasive essay well-being.
Besides helping you look great it helps you feel great, too. There are different types of exercises which give different results. Strength training, such as lifting weights, produces dramatic differences in physical appearance and what is a problem solution essay, raises one's metabolic rate. It also improves athletic performance and builds stronger bones. Cardiovascular training builds a powerful heart and don't drink persuasive essay, strong lungs. Dissertation Hypothesis? It helps prevent hypertension, obesity, heart disease, and Type Two diabetes. Exercise is not all about physical looks, it also has to do a lot with your actual health and well being.
For example, many overweight people tend to don't drink be more susceptible to higher cholesterol and essay composition, blood pressure. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? Well, by working out and is a problem essay, adding an exercise routine into don't your normal everyday life, you can help to decrease risk factors drastically. It is said that over 60% of American grown-ups are on the heavier side, or overweight. Essay? Only about 15% actually engage in the slightest amount of exercise. “Obesity alone makes a person very vulnerable to heart disease, but also susceptible to an additional 65% chance of having at least one added risk for heart disease, diabetes and or stroke and a 50% possibility of drink and drive persuasive essay having two or more of these as possible risk factors. Some other possible risks are high blood pressure, high blood sugar, cholesterol and blood fats that are not all curable with insulin and are considered the Metabolic Syndrome” (Lissner, 886-92). This becomes an even bigger risk when areas of fat accumulate around a person’s middle area and the organs in which the fat surrounds. Basically, people become obese by consuming more calories than should be consumed for a whole day and not using up that energy that has been consumed in calories by exerting it in a physical manner such as exercise. Some people have a fast metabolism which would be the ucla scholarship essays, people you see eating whatever they want and still look fit or have the average metabolism where you are what you eat, which makes it a lot harder to and drive essay stay fit and lean. Exercise has also had a tremendous effect on the aging process of the body. What Is A Problem Solution Essay? Apparently, the increase in exercise has an drink and drive persuasive, enormous effect on nerve cell health and with how long those cells are alive. By maintaining these healthy cells it helps to is a problem promote the drink and drive, production of antioxidants which help to protect cells from damage, this is the leading cause of aging.
No matter what your age is you can still benefit from exercise not only mentally but also help to prolong your ability to function later on in life. Alumni Scholarship? But most importantly “you will be reducing the chance of having a stroke and clotting which can result in deep vein thrombosis and death, which is more critical as we age” (Tremblay, 814-18). Keeping up a regular cardio routine is drink and drive persuasive essay, a great way to get in shape and essay, also it helps benefit you in various prolonging ways. It is still a good idea to have weight lifting as a part of your routine too. There are six different muscle groups that you can work on with weights.
You have arms, back, chest, shoulders, legs, and then abs. Don't Drink And Drive Essay? You want to try and keep them all worked out pretty evenly. Keeping it switched up and by not concentrating on let's just say bench press, you keep your body guessing and keep it from getting immune to ucla alumni the exercise. Instead of just doing bench press all the time you can switch it up to one week doing dumbbells, maybe cables the next, or maybe even just doing flat out don't drink and drive persuasive, push ups. Then you have the machine style workout which you can substitute in one week. Also, you can switch the focus point up, maybe you want to concentrate on your upper chest this week and lower or mid chest the following week. With this type of confusion, your muscles will grow much stronger and you will notice much more of an improvement. Exercise and diet are key factors in essay composition staying physically and mentally healthy. It is a known fact that if you look great and feel great you will live a longer and happier life. Don't And Drive Persuasive? It is important to take one's age, health, and current physical activity level into consideration when writing an exercise and diet plan.
There are many people out there, such as nutritionists, personal trainers, and even personal doctors, who can help develop a diet and exercise plan that is right for him/her. There are so many facilities out essay composition, there to help keep you alive and healthy. Gebhardt, S.E., Matthews, R.H. (2006). Nutrition Value of don't drink and drive Foods, United States Department of we change essay Agriculture, Human Nutrition Information Service, Home and Garden Bulletin Number 72. Lissner L., Levitsky D.A., Strupp B.J., Kalkwarf H.J., Roe D.A. (2005). Dietary fat and the regulation of energy intake in human subjects. Am J Clin Nutr, 46, 886-892.
Tremblay, A., Simoneau, J., Bouchard, C. (2004). Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? The impact of Exercise Intensity on Body Fatness and dissertation hypothesis question, Skeletal Muscle Metabolism. Metabolism. 43(7): 814-818. MOST POPULAR ARGUMENTATIVE ESSAY TOPICS OF 2017. If you need assistance with essay writing, feel free to contact our friendly support team or place an order and we will gladly help you. Don't And Drive Persuasive? You can download free essay samples in hypothesis PDF format from our Home Page ('Download Our Samples' section). Find out what an English essay is and how to write it correctly. If you need more information on this question read other articles about essay writing on our website.
Write an argumentative essay that will help you beat your opponent's counter argument. Pick the most appealing side, do research, be prepared to enter the opinion counter stand. The Most Popular Argumentative Essay Topics of 2017: The List. Here is the drink persuasive essay, list of the most popular argumentative essay topics of 2017. You can either use any of these topics for your essay or get one written for you from scratch. Enter your email address to receive exclusive members-only discounts.
We do handle rewriting of ucla alumni scholarship essays assignments. Simply let us know how many pages are needed to be changed and don't drink and drive, we will deliver it to you on or before the date specified. Make sure you choose Editing/rewriting in we change essay the Academic Level section. We can certainly adhere to any guidelines sent to us; we have a vast experience in persuasive essay writing papers on almost every academic topic out there. After an textiles coursework profile, order is placed, the guidelines and example can be uploaded for the writer to look at, as well as any other material you wish to provide. Even though we are the US based company, we do have a contact number in the UK (phone: 020 8133 2155, fax: 020 7692 7990).
All the phone calls and don't and drive persuasive essay, faxes are redirected to dissertation hypothesis question our head office. We would be glad to don't drink and drive persuasive essay proofread your assignment, please feel free to visit our order page or contact us via email with assignment criteria if unsure. When placing an order, make sure you choose proofreading in the Academic Level section. You certainly can email us the sources for question, your paper once you've ordered, our email address is drink, email@example.com. Our support representatives check email 24x7 and dissertation hypothesis question, will add the files you send to don't drink persuasive your order. You might want to specify your order number to expedite the process. Alternatively, you can upload the files manually, after logging in to your personal control panel, the files will go directly to the writer. Yes we do write research proposals, simply state the topic when placing an order, or indicate in is a solution essay your order instructions, that the don't drink essay, writer can choose it for you. The research proposal qualifies as a research paper type of assignment. What Is A Problem Solution? We can certainly provide you with a 2:1 level writing. Don't Drink And Drive? But, because of differing standards of grading between universities (and even professors) a guarantee of grade is near impossible for any writing service, we suggest you to be careful of those that do.
However, we do guarantee we will work on your paper until you are completely satisfied with it, if we don't get it right the first time we'll revise it until we do. Yes, we can develop a primary research which qualifies as research paper on our order placement list. Yes, we have an accumulative discount policy for returning customers, starting at 3% to 15% off every new order. Every new order you place counts towards the total ordered amount thus increasing the discount level. It means, that if you, for example, have $640 worth of orders (thus qualifying for 6% discount), the flag essay, new order of $100 that you place will bring your totals to $740 and will be calculated at 7% off rate. Yes, we can develop a questionnaire. It qualifies as a research paper type of assignment on our order placement list. Our assignments are completely free of plagiarism. We do not resell our work. We provide complete and total confidentiality to don't drink and drive the extent that even your writer does not know your identity. We provide one of the essay composition, best writing services available.
We have 100% customer satisfaction guarantee which means that customer satisfaction is our top priority. NEED HELP? Start a Live Chat with an Operator, contact us +1-845-228-8552 or send a message. A service of persuasive Insight Innovations LLC, Phoenix, AZ. Please enter your phone number to get a call from our Academic Success Manager.
We care about your privacy. Your browser is out-of-date. Please download one of essay macroeconomics these up-to-date, free and excellent browsers: For more security, speed, comfort and fun. We have detected you have disabled http cookies on your browser. Please note that it might affect overall website performance.
The following part(s) of don't essay our website might not function properly with cookies disabled: To use chat, please enable cookies or use phone or email to ucla contact our support representatives.
Buy Essay Online Cheap -
Drinking and driving persuasive essay persuasive essay on drunk
kk thesis Frederick Suppe argues that skeptical arguments from Descartes to Feyerabend are based upon don't essay, the KK thesis, and therefore are not worth worrying about. Essay Composition? It seems to me that his argument is don't and drive persuasive unwarranted, and the purpose of alumni, this paper is to reconstruct skeptical arguments without the drink, KK thesis. Roughly speaking, these skeptical arguments presuppose a weaker version of the KK thesis which does not require either: (1) the identity of the knower A and the knower of A's knowing, or (2) actual existence of the knowledge of A's knowing. If we refuse this weaker thesis, this will cause a serious problem to the very enterprise of what is a solution essay, epistemology. Drink Persuasive Essay? Surely Suppe should take skeptical doubts more seriously.
In his forthcoming book, Facts, Theories, and Scientific Observation , Frederick Suppe dismisses traditional skepticism as follows: The collapse of the Cartesian and Empiricist epistemological programs into pervasive skepticism has been one long series of is a, dismal corollaries to don't and drive the level confusions inherent in Descartes' uncritical acceptance of the KK Thesis. Kantian subjectivism and its neo-Kantian successors, including Pragmatism and associated radical relativisms, are attractive alternatives only against the background of those confusions. These level confusions naturally led epistemologists to conflate the evidential basis for knowledge with reasons given in justification for knowledge and philosophers of science to conflate the scholarship, reasoning given in scientific articles with the belief formation process used to obtain scientific knowledge. (Suppe forthcoming, Part II chapter 5, section 5) In short, Suppe claims that the majority of traditional philosophers have kept making level confusions by accepting the persuasive, KK thesis, and this is the only reason skepticism seemed so forceful to them. If Suppe is right, since the KK thesis is now widely rejected, we have no reason to worry about skepticism. But I think that Suppe's claim is unwarranted. 2. The KK thesis and what is wrong with it. To start with, we should refresh our memory about what the KK thesis is and what is wrong with it.
the KK thesis is is supported by textiles coursework shop profile, several epistemologists. Jaakko Hintikka (1962) is the most famous recent defender, and persuasive he formulates the thesis as follows: namely, if a knows that p, then a knows that a knows that p . There are several arguments against the KK thesis. First of all, even though Hintikka 'proved' the thesis from several axioms of epistemic logic (Hintikka1962, 104-105), his proof was circular because the axioms used in the proof implicitly presupposed the KK thesis (Chisholm, 1963, 784-787). Of course this circularity does not show that the KK thesis itself is alumni problematic. The First substantial objection is that the KK thesis implies that the knower has self-knowledge, that is, the knower a knows about himself/herself/itself (Carrier 1974, 141). This means that according to the KK thesis those who do not have the concept of self (children, dogs etc.) have no knowledge whatsoever. This sounds counterintuitive.
Hilpinen's (1970) argument is also illuminating. Drink And Drive Essay? Suppose a knows that p implies that a has a justified true belief that p, namely. where Bap means a believes that p and Jap means a is ucla essays justified in believing that p. Suppose also that the distribution law about knowledge holds, namely. (2) and (3) are widely admitted among philosophers. Then from (1), (2) and and drive persuasive (3), we can infer as follows: There are several dubious conjuncts on the right side of (4), but the most dubious one is the shop profile, term BaJap, namely a believes that a is justified in persuasive believing that p. Does this follow from coursework profile, a knows that p (this is persuasive what (4) implies)? Hilpinen thinks that it is what is a solution imaginable that a fails to recognize the situation (e.g. she has enough evidence for the knowledge claim) that justifies a's believing that p, even when a knows that p. This is an uncomfortable consequence of the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, KK thesis. Hintikka's reply to these challenges is that he is talking about a strong notion of 'knowing' (Hintikka 1970). From this point of view, the above difficulties are not difficulties, but merely show that there are differences between Hintikka's strong sense of knowing and 'knowing' in our ordinary language.
For example, the first difficulty with self knowledge disappears by asserting that children and dogs do not have this strong sense of composition, knowledge. Don't Persuasive? The second problem with the essay, KK thesis by don't drink, Hilpinen can be dealt with by interpreting Jap quite strongly. Essay? For example, read Jap as a has incorrigible evidence for believing that p. Drink And Drive Persuasive Essay? This implies that a has a proof for incorrigibility of the hypothesis, evidence, and therefore something like BaJap and JaJap are required. Drink And Drive Persuasive? With this strong interpretation, the accepted formula Kap - Bap J ap p does (almost) imply the KK thesis. Suppe (1977) criticizes this move, because the strong sense of knowledge does not help us in understanding scientific knowledge.
He enumerates four features of dissertation hypothesis question, scientific knowledge which are not suitable for the KK thesis. First, the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, KK thesis make a correspondence notion of truth impossible, but this is necessary for scientific knowledge. Second, the standards of rationality in science keep changing, and this together with the KK thesis implies a relativism. Third, science's procedure to assess knowledge claims is fallible, therefore the incorrigibility does not apply to essay composition science. Drink Persuasive? Finally, the KK thesis make sophisticated observational knowledge impossible, because scientific observations depend on background knowledge, which is not incorrigible. I totally agree with Suppe that Hintikka's strong sense of composition, knowing does not help us much in philosophy of science (though I disagree with him in that the rejection of the KK thesis eliminate the skeptical doubt about correspondence notion of truth and the relativism on the scientific rationality). I think that this is a good reason to reject the KK thesis, so if the KK thesis is essential for skepticism, we also have a reason to reject skeptical doubts. 3. Suppe's argument against don't drink and drive persuasive essay, skepticism. In chapter 10 of his 1989 book, Suppe argues that skeptical arguments by Berkeley, Hume, Kuhn, Feyerabend and others depend essentially on composition the KK thesis (332).
What is the argument for this claim? In the persuasive, first section of question, this chapter Suppe provides an overview of the don't drink and drive, history of skeptical arguments by hypothesis question, empiricists up to don't drink and drive persuasive essay the logical positivism, but Suppe does not mention the KK thesis here. In the next section Suppe summarizes Feyerabend's (1958) relativistic argument, and here Suppe tries to connect Feyerabend with the KK thesis. Feyerabend claims that phenomena cannot determine interpretations of sentences. Feyerabend's argument goes as follows.
If an observer O utters a sentence S because he observes a phenomenon P and recognizes that S 'fits' P, this relation of phenomenological adequacy between P and ucla scholarship S is another phenomenon, P'. But O can recognize P' by relating it to S', and this calls for P'', S'', and so on don't drink and drive persuasive infinitely. Therefore phenomena P cannot determine the interpretation of the sentence S. Rather, we need somewhat arbitrary assignments of interpretations. (Feyerabend 1958, 155; see also Suppe 1989, 312). Alumni? Suppe also attributes to Feyerabend following position: experience is incapable of playing any significant role in ascertaining the truth of either theoretical or observation assertions (Suppe 1989, 312). This position seems to be derived from the above-mentioned infinite regress argument, but this derivation is possible only if one accepts the K-K Thesis (Suppe 1989, 313).
His argument for this claim is don't essay worth quoting: For if this thesis is accepted, then from the fact that experience cannot show that such a correspondence holds and from the vaguely plausible assumption (tacit in his discussion) that such a correspondence could not be known except if displayed in experience, it would follow that one cannot know that P is true; hence one cannot know that he knows that P; hence via the K-K Thesis, one cannot know that P. But we do have empirical knowledge, so we must reject the idea that fitting the physical world plays any role in knowledge. But this argument (and I can think of no other one compatible with what he says that will serve his purposes) depends essentially on problem solution essay the K-K Thesis, for if it is denied, the requirement of truth by correspondence is totally compatible with Feyerabend's other claims: One can experientially know that P, where P fitting or corresponding to the physical world is a condition of knowledge, but one cannot know that one knows that P. (Suppe 1989, 313; italics in original) This is the most elaborate argument to connect the don't, KK thesis and skepticism (or relativism) that I can find in Suppe's book. Ucla Alumni Scholarship Essays? What does this argument show? First, Suppe reconstructs a plausible line of Feyerabend's argument using the KK thesis (thus the KK thesis is a part of the sufficient condition for don't drink and drive persuasive essay Feyerabend's relativism).
The argument goes as follows: F1. Suppose that a correspondence between a sentence and the australian physical objects play an essential role in knowledge. F2. Experience cannot show that a correspondence between P and don't drink and drive persuasive physical objects holds (because of alumni scholarship, infinite regress). F3. Such a correspondence could not be known except if displayed in experience. F4. If S knows that P, then S knows that S knows that P. (the KK thesis) F5. From F1, If S knows that S knows that P, S knows about the correspondence between P and physical objects.
F6. From F2 and don't F3, S does not know about the correspondence between P and physical objects. F7. From F5 and F6, S does not know that S know that P. F8. From F4 and F7, S does not know that P. F9. Since we do have knowledge, assumption F1 is false. Then he shows that in this line of argument the dissertation hypothesis question, KK thesis is essential.
He also adds, I can think of no other [line of drink persuasive, argument] compatible with what he says that will serve his purpose. Ucla Scholarship Essays? That is all. This is supposed to show that the KK thesis is a necessary condition for Feyerabend's relativism! Suppe provides similar arguments for the relationship between Cartesian/Humean skepticism and the KK thesis in his 1977, but they do not do any better than this. He constructs lines of argument for Cartesian skepticism and persuasive essay Hume's skeptical argument against induction using the KK thesis, and shows that the textiles coursework profile, KK thesis is essential in don't drink persuasive these lines of argument. Despite this obvious gap in inference, he asserts that the KK thesis has showed up at virtually every crucial juncture as empiricism has proceeded toward complete capitulation to the skeptic (Suppe 1989, 332).
From this, he arrives at this conclusion: a viable epistemology of science, where experience plays an textiles coursework profile, essential role in knowledge, must begin by denying the don't persuasive, K-K thesis, thereby rendering the dissertation hypothesis, Cartesian skeptic's challenges question-begging (332). Thus, to don't drink persuasive essay undermine Suppe's claim, all I have to do is to show that there are plausible alternative interpretations of skeptical arguments which do not appeal to the KK thesis. I don't have to even show that my interpretations are more plausible than Suppe's, because to avoid dismissing skeptical doubt as question-begging, mere existence of a plausible and non-question-begging interpretation of skepticism is enough. This is what I try to show in the next section. 4. Alternative interpretations of traditional skeptical arguments. The purpose of this section is to propose alternative interpretations of skeptical arguments, ones by the KK thesis and others by what I call the HEKK thesis (I will explain the details of the thesis later). The basic idea of my own interpretations is that a thesis weaker than the KK thesis supports the purpose of skeptical arguments enough.
To illustrate, take an example from the above Feyerabend's argument. My alternative interpretation goes as follows: F'1. What Is A Solution? F'2. F'3. The same as F1, F2 and F3. F'4.
If S knows that P, then someone can know that S knows that P. F'5. From F'1, If someone knows that S knows that P, he/she knows about the correspondence between P and physical objects. F'6. From F'2 and don't and drive persuasive essay F'3, no one can know about the hypothesis, correspondence between P and physical objects. F'7. From F'5 and F'6, no one can know that S know that P. F'8. From F'4 and F'7, S does not know that P. F'9. Since we do have knowledge, assumption F'1 is false.
The point is that, since F6 is a quite strong claim, F4 can be replaced with a weaker thesis F'4. In this way we do not need the KK thesis to reconstruct Feyerabend's argument. The following sections are attempts to investigate the possibility of this kind of interpretations for traditional skeptical arguments in general. I use Descartes, Berkeley and drink Hume as examples. 4-a. Descartes' methodical skepticism. First of alumni scholarship, all, we should look at Descartes's methodical skepticism. Actually I do not think that Descartes' own statements are clear enough to settle the argument. Here is the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, statement of coursework profile, his methodical skepticism. . reason already convinces me that I must withhold assent no less carefully from what is not plainly certain and don't persuasive essay indubitable than from what is obviously false; so the discovery of some reason for doubt as regards each opinion will justify the rejection of all (Descartes  1971, 61). The methodology itself is stated here clearly, but he does not tell us how reason convinced him to accept the strict methodology.
Here is a room for interpretations. First, let us assume Descartes' uncritical acceptance of the KK Thesis (Suppe forthcoming, Part II chapter 5, section 5). Then surely we can understand why Descartes set the criteria so high. To know something, I should know that I know. To know that I know, I should eliminate all possibilities that I am mistaken. I must withhold assent when I cannot eliminate such counterpossibilities, because in dissertation hypothesis that case the belief is not knowledge. Therefore methodical doubt is and drive persuasive essay necessary (Suppe 1977, 717-718). To put slightly more formally, the interpretation goes as follows (using Cartesian Demon as an example): D1. If I know that there is an external world, then I know that I know that there is an external world. (the KK thesis) D2.
I know that I know that there is an alumni scholarship essays, external world only if I eliminate all counterpossibilities to the existence of external world. D3. I cannot eliminate the counterpossibility that a Cartesian Demon is deceiving me. D4. Therefore I do not know that I know that there is an external world. D5. Therefore I do not know that there is an external world. This interpretation attributes a rather radical view to don't drink persuasive Descartes, however. If the reason to adopt methodical skepticism is the KK thesis, then actually going through the methodical doubt is a necessary condition for making a belief a piece of knowledge.
This means, people who have neither read Descartes' book nor heard about methodical doubt have no knowledge whatsoever. Maybe Descartes was that radical, but here is another interpretation. Descartes is playing the role of an epistemologist who classify beliefs into knowledge and non-knowledge, and methodical doubt is a criterion for the classification. Under this interpretation, to go through the skeptical doubt does not make a belief a piece of knowledge, any more than an composition, investigation of an ornithologist does not make a raven black. Drink And Drive Essay? Thus those who never think about methodical doubt can have knowledge, whether or not an epistemologist come to them and confirm that their beliefs are knowledge. From these considerations, I would like to propose a weaker version of the KK thesis to which Descartes might have committed himself: (5) if a knows that p, then someone can know that a knows that p. This thesis explains Descartes motivation equally well. We might have knowledge but we do not know which beliefs are knowledge.
According to (5), when we start an epistemological investigation, we should be able to find out which ones are knowledge, and ucla alumni as before, knowledge should be beyond any doubt. Therefore, until epistemologists can eliminate the don't and drive persuasive essay, possibility of the existence of the Cartesian demon, they should withhold classification of knowledge and profile non-knowledge. This is why epistemologists should obey the strict methodology. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? To put in the same way as above D1-D5: D'1. If I know that there is an external world, then someone can find out that I know that there is an external world. Essay Composition? (a variation of (5)) D'2. Someone can find out that I know that there is an and drive essay, external world only if he/she can eliminate all counterpossibilities to the existence of external world. D'3.
No one can eliminate the counterpossibility that a Cartesian Demon is deceiving me. D'4. Therefore no one can find out that I know that there is an composition, external world. D'5. Therefore I do not know that there is an external world.
Some comments on (5) are in order here. First, even though I call it a weaker version of the KK thesis, it is not the drink persuasive essay, KK thesis at all. The KK thesis requires the identity of the knower a and the knower of a's knowing, while the weaker thesis does not. The KK thesis requires the actual presence of knowledge about knowledge, while the weaker thesis requires only the possibility of such knowledge about knowledge. Another comment is necessary about this possibility. When I say someone can know, what kind of modality do I mean? Since Descartes' program requires that we actually can find out which beliefs are knowledge, 'logical possibility' or 'causal possibility' is not suitable for alumni scholarship essays the purpose (logically speaking I can be omniscient, and causally speaking, there can be a world in which I know about the Cartesian demon without violating any causal law). I would like to propose a modality of humanly possible: if a reasonably competent human being meditates like Descartes under ordinary circumstances, she should be able to distinguish knowledge from non-knowledge eventually. With this last consideration, it is appropriate to rewrite (5) as follows: (6) If a knows that p, then it is don't drink and drive persuasive humanly possible that someone knows that a knows that p. where H stands for humanly possible and Ex stands for shop profile a quantifier there is at least one x such that. I shall call the thesis (6) the and drive persuasive essay, HEKK thesis henceforth. To sum up, in this subsection I have proposed an alternative interpretation of coursework profile, Cartesian skepticism using the HEKK thesis instead of the don't essay, KK thesis. If all our epistemological efforts fail to show that there is no such thing as the Cartesian demon, then the HEKK thesis is enough to ucla scholarship destroy most of don't drink and drive, our knowledge (and this is what happened in Descartes' case).
In this sense, Cartesian skepticism does not depend on the KK thesis. 4-b. Berkeley's rejection of substance. Next, let us briefly look at essay, Berkeley's skeptical argument against don't essay, substance, or Matter. Should We Change The Australian Flag? Here is the base line of his argument: But, though it were possible that solid, figured, moveable substances may exist without the mind, corresponding to the ideas we have of bodies, yet how is it possible for us to know this? Either we must know it by Sense or Reason. As for our senses, by them we have the knowledge only of our sensations, ideas, or those things that are immediately perceived by drink and drive persuasive, sense, call them what you will: but they do not inform us that things exist without the mind, or unperceived, like to what is a solution essay those which are perceived. This the materialists themselves acknowledge. And Drive? -- It remains therefore that if we have any knowledge at all of external things, it must be by reason inferring their existence from essay macroeconomics, what is and drive persuasive immediately perceived by problem essay, sense. But what reason can induce us to believe the existence of bodies without the and drive essay, mind, from what we perceive, since the very patrons of Matter themselves do not pretend there is any necessary connexion betwixt them and our ideas? (Berkeley  1965, section 18)
Thus, basically, Berkeley says that we cannot know about substances from essay composition, either of our two sources of knowledge, sense or reason. Therefore we have no knowledge about substance. Don't Persuasive Essay? The question is, is alumni this argument dependent on the KK thesis? Of course if we assume that Berkeley accepts the KK thesis, we can understand why Berkeley thinks that the necessary connexion between substances and ideas is don't and drive persuasive essay essential for the inference to substance; it is because, to textiles profile know that we know about substances, we should be absolutely certain that we know about don't drink essay substance. Thus the argument can be reconstructed as follows: B1. If A knows that there are substances, then A knows that A knows that there are substances. (the KK thesis) B2. Our evidence comes from coursework, one of two sources, sense or reason. B3. Neither sense or reason provides evidence that A knows that there are substances.
B4. Therefore A does not know that A knows that there are substances. B5. Therefore A does not know that there are substances. But this is by no means the only way to don't and drive essay understand Berkeley. The HEKK thesis serves exactly the same function as the KK thesis. Under the HEKK thesis, if we know about substance, then it should be humanly possible that epistemologists will find out that we certainly know about substance. Shop Profile? But under human conditions epistemologists can use only sense and reason, and neither of them assure us such a certainty. Drink Persuasive? Thus the interpretation goes as follows: B'1. If A knows that there are substances, then someone can find out that A knows that there are substances. Essay? (the HEKK thesis)
B'2. Our only ways of inquiry are by don't and drive, sense or by reason. B'3. Neither sense or reason provides evidence that A knows that there are substances. B'4.
Therefore no one can find out textiles coursework profile that A knows that there are substances. B'5. Therefore A does not know that there are substances. I think that in this case the HEKK thesis provides an even better interpretation. For, if Berkeley has the KK thesis in mind, all he has to show is the absence of certainty about knowledge on substance. But his proof is intended to be much stronger: impossibility of don't drink and drive, certainty about the knowledge, by any human being. This scope of should flag essay, proof (whether it is valid or not) is don't drink and drive persuasive essay more suitable for should the HEKK thesis than for the KK thesis. 4-c. Hume's skepticism on induction. Hume's famous argument on inductive knowledge can be treated in a similar manner. For Hume, the sole source of our knowledge is what he calls impressions.
Then how is the knowledge about causation possible? Hume argues that all we know about drink and drive persuasive essay causation from impression is a constant conjunction of cause and effect in macroeconomics our memory (Hume  1878, Bk. Don't Drink Essay? I, Pt. III, sect. Ucla? VI). However, he feels that a constant conjunction is not enough for causation. Rather, he thinks that people require that the relation between cause and effect be a necessary connexion (ibid.). Don't And Drive Essay? How can we know about such a necessary connection?
One way is to is a assume the following principle: instances, of which we have no experience, must resemble those, of which we have had experience, and that the cause of nature continues always uniformly the same (ibid. italics in original). Call this the principle of uniformity. Obviously there can be no demonstrative arguments to prove the principle (ibid. italics in original). But this principle is not even probabilistic knowledge (in Hume's own terminology, probability; ibid.). Persuasive Essay? The only possible way for our probabilistic knowledge to go beyond our impressions is to assume some causation (ibid., Bk. Coursework? I, Pt.
III, sect. II), and the principle apparently goes beyond our impressions. But the principle to be proved is necessary to establish such causation. Therefore, since the same principle cannot be both the cause and effect of another, the principle itself cannot be a probabilistic knowledge (ibid., Bk. And Drive Persuasive? I, Pt. III, sect. VI).
Now we are not interested in the details and validity of Hume's argument, but in the overall structure of essay macroeconomics, it. Like Berkeley's argument, this argument can be reconstructed using the KK thesis, but again like Berkeley's argument, Hume argues against not existence but possibility of knowledge about drink and drive persuasive knowledge. One characteristic feature of Hume's argument is his explicit appeal to circularity or infinite regress in the denial of the essay, principle of uniformity. This seems favorable for the KK thesis interpretation because the KK thesis implies an drink persuasive essay, infinite regress (Kap - KaKap - KaKaKap - . ). On the other hand, my HEKK thesis does not imply such an coursework shop profile, infinite regress. But still I think that Hume's infinite regress argument can be reconstructed without the KK thesis. Let us compare following formulatons: (a) The KK thesis interpretation.
H1. If A knows that x causes y, then A knows that A knows that x causes y. (the KK thesis) H2. A knows that A knows that x causes y only drink and drive persuasive if A can infer that x causes y from evidence available for A. H3. To infer that x causes y, A need to know that the principle of uniformity holds. H3 replacing that x causes y with that the principle of uniformity holds) H5. Since H4 entails an infinite regress, A never has enough evidence to alumni infer that x causes y.
H6. Therefore A does not know that A knows that x causes y. H7. And Drive? Therefore A does not know that x causes y. (b) The HEKK thesis interpretation. H1.
If A knows that x causes y, then someone can find out that A knows that x causes y. (the HEKK thesis) H2. Someone can find out textiles coursework profile that A knows that x causes y only don't drink and drive persuasive if it is possible to ucla alumni scholarship infer that x causes y from evidence available for don't drink and drive human beings. H3. To infer that x causes y, the principle of uniformity is necessary. H4. The only (humanly possible) way to establish the principle of uniformity is to infer it from itself. H5.
Since H4 entails an infinite regress, no one can know that the principle of uniformity holds. H6. Essay Composition? Therefore no one can find out don't and drive persuasive essay that A knows that x causes y. H7. Macroeconomics? Therefore A does not know that x causes y. In this case the two interpretations are not symmetrical, but it seems to me that both formulations interpret Hume's argument well. 5. The HEKK thesis and the fate of epistemology. As my analyses in the previous sections show, the KK thesis has played almost no role in drink persuasive essay skeptical arguments. Ucla Essays? Even if the above-mentioned philosophers did hold the KK thesis, their arguments can be easily reformulated without the thesis.
Rather, I have found that what they need is don't persuasive a weaker thesis, the HEKK thesis. What is the point of replacing the KK thesis with the HEKK thesis? Can we not dismiss the profile, HEKK thesis as easy as the KK thesis? First of all, the HEKK thesis is immune from most difficulties raised against the KK thesis. The HEKK thesis does not require self-knowledge of the don't essay, knower, and it does not imply that the essay composition, knower believes that she is justified in don't believing. Therefore the should we change the australian, HEKK thesis does not require Hintikka's strong sense of knowledge. The place of incorrigibility in the strong sense of knowledge and in the HEKK thesis are also different. Don't Drink And Drive? The strong sense of knowledge requires that the incorrigibility should be attained with the evidence available to ucla alumni the knower. The HEKK thesis also requires a kind of incorrigibility, but this is an drink and drive, incorrigibility after all humanly possible efforts by essay, epistemologists. This point is drink persuasive essay related to another point, namely the HEKK thesis is even compatible with a kind of externalist notion of knowledge.
The externalism is should we change the australian flag a position that the and drive, justification of a belief has nothing to do with evidence available to the knower herself. For example, existence of an appropriate causal relation between the knower and the state of affairs expressed by p may be enough to we change say that 'a is justified in drink and drive persuasive believing that p'. Should We Change The Australian Flag Essay? The HEKK thesis is compatible with this view as far as the 'appropriate causal relation' is knowable to epistemologists. Since I agree with many philosophers that externalism is a promising approach to analysis of scientific and other kinds of knowledge, Suppe's objection to the KK thesis, i.e. the notion of knowledge associated with the KK thesis do not help us in understanding scientific knowledge, does not apply to the HEKK thesis. But, one may object, two of Suppe's points had to drink do with the essay composition, fact that if we accept the don't drink essay, KK thesis, we are led to skepticism/relativism. Ucla Essays? This is exactly what I have proved about the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, HEKK thesis. Then why do we not dismiss the HEKK thesis for this reason? I think that the answer lies in the amount of sacrifice to get rid of skepticism. To give up the KK thesis does not cause us a lot of coursework shop profile, problems, so if by doing so we can get rid of skepticism, we are willing to give it up. But giving up the HEKK thesis has a grave consequence. Drink Persuasive? The HEKK thesis is a corollary of the following thesis:
The thesis (7) states that no truth is out of our reach. Dissertation Question? I would like to call it the 'epistemological optimism' thesis. To reject the essay, HEKK thesis leads to rejection of the 'epistemological optimism' thesis, which is a widely accepted thesis, especially by both sides of the realism - anti-realism debate (e.g. Putnam 1981,134; Fine 1986, 131; Devitt 1997, 232 ). To see the result of the rejection in epistemology, let us consider a negation of the HEKK thesis:
This is equivalent to. with some easy transformations, namely, a knows p, and it is humanly necessary that, for all x, x does not know that a knows that p. It is true that we are capable of coursework, knowing something under (10), but at the same time we can never know that. This sounds too much a sacrifice to avoid skepticism. Instead of discarding the HEKK thesis, if we adopt Kantian subjectivism or its neo-Kantian successors, including Pragmatism and associated radical relativisms (Suppe forthcoming, Part II chapter 5, section 5), we can avoid skepticism to drink essay some extent. In this sense, despite Suppe's claim quoted in is a the introduction, these are still attractive alternatives. The relationships among theses I have discussed in this paper are illustrated in Figure 1. In this paper, first I have discussed that the KK thesis with Hintikka's strong sense of knowledge is unhelpful for don't drink persuasive the inquiry of essay, scientific knowledge. This seems a good reason to reject the KK thesis, so if the drink and drive persuasive, KK thesis is essential for skepticism, we can also reject skepticism.
However, Suppe's argument to connect skepticism and the KK thesis is weak, and ucla scholarship essays I have argued that the don't drink and drive, HEKK thesis, a weaker version of the profile, KK thesis, is enough for skeptical arguments. Unlike the KK thesis, to give up the HEKK thesis causes a serious epistemological problem. It seems to me to adopt one of Kantian alternatives is much more attractive than giving up the HEKK thesis. Certainly Suppe should take skepticism more seriously.References. Barense, J.G. (1966) Knowledge and true belief: Hintikka's logic of one notion, presentation at drink and drive, the APA Pacific Division Annual Meeting. Berkeley, G. ( 1965) Principles of should we change the australian flag, Human Knowledge , reprinted in Berkeley's Philosophical Writings . ed. by D.M. Don't And Drive? Armstrong.
New York: Collier Macmillan. Carrier, L.S. (1974) Skepticism made certain in The Journal of Philosophy 71, 140-150. Chisholm, R.M. (1963) The logic of knowing in The Journal of Philosophy 60, 773-795. Descartes, R. ( 1971) Meditations on hypothesis First Philosophy , translation in E. Don't And Drive Persuasive? Anscombe and P. Geach (trans., ed.) Descartes; Philosophical Writings . Prentice Hall. Devitt, M. (1996) Realism and Truth , second edition with new afterword.
Blackwell. Fine, A. (1986) Shaky Game; Einstein, realism and the quantum theory . University of Chicago Press. Feyerabend, P. (1958) An attempt at a realistic interpretation of experience in Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58, 143-170. Hall, M. (1976) Skepticism and should we change knowing that one knows in Canadian Journal of Philosophy 6, 655-663. Hilpinen, R. (1970) Knowing that one knows and the classical definition of knowledge in Synthese 21, 109-132. Hintikka, J. (1962) Knowledge and Belief: An introduction to the logic of the two notions . Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
--. (1970) 'Knowing that one knows' reviewed in Synthese 21, 141-162. Hume, D. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? ( 1878) A Treaties on Human Nature , a reprint edited by T.H. Green and T.H. Textiles Coursework Profile? Grose. London: Longman, Green and don't drink and drive essay co. Putnam, H. (1981) Reason, Truth and History . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Suppe, F. (1973) Facts and empirical truth, in textiles coursework profile Canadian Journal of don't drink and drive, Philosophy 3, 197-212.
--. (1977) Afterword, in F. We Change Essay? Suppe (ed.) The Structure of Scientific Theories , 2nd ed. University of Illinois Press. --. (1989) The Semantic Conception of Theories and Scientific Realism . University of Illinois Press. --. (forthcoming) Facts, Theories, and Scientific Observation .
High Quality Custom Essay Writing Service -
Drinking and driving persuasive essay don t text and drive persuasive
op ed essay example THE STANDARDS THAT WILL BE USED. TO EVALUATE YOUR OP-ED PIECE. The Point: Does the don't and drive essay, opinion piece have a point that is clearly expressed? The Point may be a recommendation for action or it may be to alert readers to essay a problem. The author should make a single point well. You, as the reader, should be able to explain the author's message in a sentence or two. 6-7: The opinion piece has an original, well-argued point. Don't Essay? The piece draws the reader into looking at the topic in a new way or with new insight. The reader can readily summarize what the essay macroeconomics, author is saying and why. 4-5: The opinion piece makes a point that appears original.
But the supporting data appear a bit muddled. And Drive Essay? Readers are left with questions: Why is did the author take this position? Why take this position rather than an alternative one? 2-3: The piece leaves readers confused as to essay macroeconomics what point the author is trying to make. The reader cannot readily summarize the author's key point or the data supporting the position seem not to really support it. 1: The paper lacks an identifiable point. Drink? Readers are left confused as to what point the should the australian flag essay, author is don't persuasive essay, making and why. Persuasive: Does the should we change, piece persuade the don't, reader? A good piece argues effectively for a particular point.
Even though the composition, reader may not ultimately agree with the author, the reader comes away from the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, piece willing to seriously consider the author's perspective. 6-7: A reader comes away from reading the is a, piece feeling the don't and drive, author has effectively argued for dissertation hypothesis question a certain point. The author uses concrete examples that resonate with readers. 4-5: The opinion piece highlights an important topic. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? But it does not really convince readers as to the value of the author's position. 2-3: The opinion piece seems mostly a personal venting.
The author is not reaching out to readers or trying to connect with them in a meaningful way. 1: The piece is unconvincing. An unbiased reader, reading this piece, would not find the piece very persuasive. Hook and Structure: Does the opinion piece engage the reader right at composition the beginning? Is there evidence of thoughtful organization? Does the author summarize the main point at the end? 6-7: The main point is effectively stated in the first few sentences. These first few sentences capture the reader's attention and don't persuasive, draw the reader into reading further. Problem Solution? The author effectively summarizes the piece's argument in a strong final paragraph.
4-5: Readers are not immediately draw into the argument. But they are not put off by don't and drive it either. They find the piece reasonable but a little slow moving. It does not keep your attention. The final paragraph does not offer a powerful restatement of the author's position. 2-3: The piece makes a basic point.
But it does not catch your attention. It does draw you in at we change the australian flag the beginning nor summarize its message at the end. 1: The author never draws the reader into the opinion piece. It is not clear what the author is saying nor why it is important. Writing and Clarity: Is the piece readily understandable to non-academic readers? General readers should find the piece easy and interesting to read. Persuasive? There should be few grammatical and spelling errors. 6-7: The writing is clear. The author's own voice and perspective come through in a convincing way. You can identify with the author and the position she or he takes.
There are no grammatical mistakes that distract from the author's argument. 4-5: The writing is reasonable. The sentences and paragraphs are a bit too long or the passive voice is shop profile, emphasized. There is a bit too much jargon. 2-3: The author tends to drink go on too long. It is dissertation hypothesis question, not really clear what point she or he is don't and drive, making. The author has long sentences and paragraphs. 1: A reader is left confused as to what point the author is hypothesis, trying to make.
Tone: Is the opinion piece polite and don't and drive persuasive, respectful? The focus in on persuading the reader rather than voicing indignation or condemnation. 6-7: The opinion piece is polite and dissertation hypothesis, respectful in don't drink, tone. Essay? Rather than dismissing the other side, it acknowledges its value while disagreeing with it. It comes across as written by a thoughtful professional versed in the subject being discussed. 4-5: There is generally a polite tone.
But the author does not acknowledge that reasonable people might disagree regarding the point being made. And Drive Persuasive? The author asserts there is one reasonable position and she or he is presenting it. 2-3: The piece comes across as quite opinionated. It appears the author is venting about something that bothers her or him. 1: The piece is similar to a political attack ad. The author is pouring at rage with little concern for who is reading the piece. [Source: a combination of Karl Schmid’s (York University) “Instructions for Wring Op-Ed Pieces and Duke University’s “Op-Ed Aritcles: How to is a solution Write and persuasive essay, Place Them (http://news.duke.edu/duke_community/oped.html)] TWO GOOD AND ONE POOR EXAMPLE. ONE POOR EXAMPLE: A Gentleman, Yes, But Not Yet a Scholar. The New Untouchables.
By Thomas L. Friedman. The New York Times, October 21, 2009. Last summer I attended a talk by essay composition Michelle Rhee, the dynamic chancellor of public schools in Washington. Just before the session began, a man came up, introduced himself as Todd Martin and whispered to don't and drive persuasive essay me that what Rhee was about to speak about our struggling public schools was actually a critical, but unspoken, reason for the Great Recession. As the shop, Harvard University labor expert Lawrence Katz explains it: If you think about the labor market today, the top half of the college market, those with the high-end analytical and problem-solving skills who can compete on the world market or game the financial system or deal with new government regulations, have done great. Don't Drink And Drive? But the bottom half of the top, those engineers and programmers working on more routine tasks and not actively engaged in developing new ideas or recombining existing technologies or thinking about what new customers want, have done poorly. They've been much more exposed to global competitors that make them easily substitutable. The Globe and composition, Mail, August 31, 2009. Moods and fashions in Japan often arrive like tsunamis, typhoons or landslides. After more than 50 years of almost uninterrupted power, the ruling Liberal Democratic Party has been buried in a general election.
Change came once before, in 1993, when a coalition of opposition parties briefly took power, but the LDP still held on to a majority in the Diet's powerful lower house. Sunday, even that last bastion fell. The world, fixated on China's rise, was slow to pay attention to don't drink and drive essay this seismic shift in the politics of the essay, globe's second-largest economy. Japanese politics has a dull image in the world's press. Most editors, when they cover Japan at all, prefer stories about the zaniness of its popular youth culture, or the wilder shores of drink Japanese sex. The main reason for this is, of course, that Japanese politics was dull, at least since the dissertation hypothesis question, mid-1950s, when the don't drink and drive essay, LDP consolidated its monopoly on power. Only real aficionados could be bothered to follow the ups and downs of the ruling party's factional bosses, many of whom were from established political families, and is a problem solution essay, most of whom relied on shady financing.
Corruption scandals erupted from and drive essay, time to time, but these, too, were usually part of textiles coursework intraparty manoeuvres to rein in persuasive essay, those who got too big for their britches. The system worked in a fashion: Factional bosses took turns as prime minister, palms were greased by various business interests, more or less capable bureaucrats decided on domestic economic policies and the United States took care of Japan's security (and much of its foreign policy). Some thought this system would last forever. Indeed, it has often been said, by Japanese and should we change the australian flag essay, foreign commentators, that a de facto one-party state suits the Japanese. Stability, based on soft authoritarianism, is the Asian way, now followed by China. Asians don't like the don't persuasive essay, messy contentiousness of parliamentary democracy. Look what happens when Asians are foolish enough to import such a system, as in South Korea or Taiwan, the argument goes.
Instead of civilized debate, they have filibusters and fisticuffs. But, notwithstanding the occasional bust-ups, Korean and Taiwanese democracies seem remarkably robust. And the argument that Japanese, or other Asians, are culturally averse to textiles profile political competition is not historically true. In fact, Japanese history is full of strife and rebellion, and don't, Japan was the essay composition, first independent Asian country with a multiparty system. Its early postwar democracy was so unruly, with mass demonstrations, militant trade unions and vigorous left-wing parties, that a deliberate attempt was made to impose the boredom of a one-party state. This happened in the mid-1950s – not for cultural reasons, but entirely because of don't and drive essay politics. Like Italy, a close parallel, Japan was a front-line Cold War state. Domestic conservatives, and the U.S. government, worried about a Communist takeover. So a large conservative coalition party (much like the Italian Christian Democrats), funded to some degree by Washington, was put in place to marginalize all left-wing opposition. This involved some strong-arm tactics, especially against the unions, but it worked mostly because the middle class settled for an informal deal: increased prosperity in exchange for political acquiescence. The “LDP state” was based on the promise, given by textiles shop profile prime minister Ikeda Hayato in 1960, that family incomes would soon be doubled.
Increasingly marginalized, the opposition dwindled into an impotent force, mere window-dressing to a one-party state. But one-party rule breeds complacency, corruption and political sclerosis. In the past decade or so, the LDP – as well as the once-almighty bureaucracy that ran the don't and drive, system – began to look incompetent. Ucla Alumni Scholarship Essays? Prime minister Junichiro Koizumi gave the party a last breath of life by promising reform in 2001, but it wasn't enough. The patience of Japan's middle class finally cracked. The victorious Democratic Party of Japan may not immediately set off any political fireworks. Its leader, Yukio Hatoyama, is an uncharismatic scion of yet another established dynasty – his grandfather, Ichiro Hatoyama, took over persuasive essay, as prime minister in 1954 from Shigeru Yoshida, who was the grandfather of the last LDP prime minister Taro Aso. The DPJ's aims are excellent: more authority to elected politicians, less bureaucratic meddling, less dependence on coursework shop profile, the United States, better relations with Asian neighbours, more power to drink persuasive essay voters and less to big business. Whether Mr.
Hatoyama and his colleagues have the wherewithal to alumni scholarship essays achieve these aims is an open question, but it would be wrong to belittle the importance of what has happened. Even if the don't drink and drive, DPJ fails to hypothesis question implement most of its reforms in short order, the fact that Japanese voters opted for don't drink persuasive change will invigorate their country's democracy. Even if the system were to become like Japan's democracy in textiles coursework profile, the 1920s, with two more or less conservative parties, this would still be preferable to a one-party state. Any opposition is better than none. It keeps the government on don't essay, its toes. A firm rejection of the one-party state will also reverberate far beyond Japan's borders. What Problem Solution Essay? It shows clearly that the desire for don't drink and drive essay political choice is not confined to a few fortunate countries in the West. Textiles Profile? This is a vital lesson, especially at a time when China's economic success is drink and drive persuasive essay, convincing too many leaders that citizens, especially but not only in Asia, want to be treated like children. Poor Example: A Gentleman, Yes, But Not Yet a Scholar. by A. B. What Solution Essay? Stoddard. Aren't you just dying to know what Sen.
John McCain (R-Ariz.) is saying about his friends in high places at Arizona State University? And has the don't and drive essay, gossip mill targeted the exact people responsible for deciding President Obama was worthy of a commencement invitation but no honorary degree? It doesn't matter if we ever learn their names — you know who you are and you should be laughing at yourselves! I can't imagine how that meeting went. Let's invite the president of the United States — a new president, an immensely popular president, the first African-American president — to be our speaker. Wait, he hasn't really spent enough time in his field to earn the degree typically conferred upon dissertation hypothesis question each speaker at graduation.
But he's so appealing, we'll invite him anyway. It's our practice to recognize an individual for his body of work, somebody who's been in their position for a long time, Sharon Keeler, an ASU spokeswoman, told The Associated Press at the time. His body of work is yet to come. That's why we're not recognizing him with a degree at the beginning of drink and drive persuasive essay his presidency. Apparently the essay, nationwide shock was more than ASU could stand, because on Sunday they suddenly announced the don't drink and drive essay, creation of a Barack Obama scholarship program. But there was no acknowledgment of error or faux pas, just bewilderment at the confusion created by composition the media.
When in and drive essay, doubt, blame the essay, media (it works for persuasive Sarah Palin). University President Michael Crow said despite the solution, view that Obama was being denied something bestowed upon Erma Bombeck, It has always been our intention to recognize and honor President Obama's accomplishments during his visit. He added, I apologize for the confusion surrounding our invitation to President Obama to address ASU students at commencement. We all know Obama couldn't care less about the degree, he's just happy for the speaking engagement in a swing state he is just itching to win in 2012. Drink? And from essay, now on some kids will be tickled to become Barack Obama scholars.
Everybody wins except for those oh-so-selective big cheeses at ASU who thought it was a good idea to essay keep a president out of an exclusive club.
Order Essay from Experienced Writers with Ease -
Картинки по запросу don t drink and drive persuasive essay
Adjunct Faculty - Baking Pastry Arts. Baltimore , MD 21217. PassionInspirationInnovation Do you live by and drive persuasive those? if Yes, read on. At Stratford University employees take enormous pride in macroeconomics their work and don't, the work of the University. Stratford is not just your next job -- it is a career where employees find their true calling and feel tremendous joy in making a difference in the lives of should flag essay, others.
Every employee is empowered and encouraged to contribute innovative ideas to enhance the student experience and learning outcomes. This is made evident by our motto, Changing lives, one student at a time. Visit our University blog at drink persuasive http://www.stratford.edu/blog Overview: Do you have true passion for shop profile making a difference in the lives of others, through the delivery of don't and drive essay, competency-based educational programs? Are you a hard-charger, able to inspire your students to achieve beyond expectations? Do you spend time thinking of new ways to profile excite and enthrall students? The Adjunct Faculty Member is don't and drive essay expected to work collaboratively with the Program Director, Campus Dean and academic support programs to facilitate student success and strengthen the reputation of the university by promoting excellence through curriculum development and the australian flag essay, delivery. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? Active participation in departmental, campus and college committees is coursework required. Participate in an environment where people love to come to work. Inspire students from diverse backgrounds to drink and drive achieve their highest potential. Engage students with your amazing communication skills + Create and alumni scholarship essays, deliver quality, competency-based educational programs that meet the needs of employers in drink persuasive high demand professions. Ucla Scholarship Essays? Promote student success by inspiring them to engage in the learning process.
Guide students to master competencies required for life-long learning and don't drink persuasive essay, career success + Uphold our most important goal teaching, mentoring, embracing and enabling our students to achieve their education and career goals. Essential Criteria for Success: + Truly enjoys interacting with students; Smiles on a regular basis + Is intuitive and dissertation hypothesis question, has a proactive approach to serving others + Is poised, positive, outgoing and don't and drive, has a professional demeanor + Demonstrates integrity, honesty, teamwork and problem solution essay, genuine commitment to education. Captivate students by utilizing your amazing communications skills. Earned Doctorate Degree in related field is preferred. A Masters degree will also be considered. Record of successful working relationships with internal and external constituencies. Teaching, research, and community service experience + The above statements are intended to describe the general nature and level of work being performed. Drink Persuasive? They are not intended to essay composition be construed as an exhaustive list of all responsibilities, duties, and drink and drive persuasive, skills required of alumni scholarship, personnel so classified. Stratford University is an Equal Opportunity Employer Changing Lives, One Student at a Time ID: 2017-3199 External Company URL: https://www.stratford.edu.
Create a job alert for Adjunct Faculty - Baking Pastry Arts at Baltimore, MD. Great! You#39;ll now receive job alerts for Adjunct Faculty - Baking Pastry Arts at don't drink Baltimore, MD. Create a job alert for Adjunct Faculty - Baking Pastry Arts at ucla alumni scholarship essays Baltimore, MD. Baltimore City Community College. And Drive Persuasive Essay? Posted 1 days ago. Ucla Alumni? VIEW JOBS 10/5/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-03T00:00 *Description/Job Summary* *An Adjunct Faculty in Dental Hygiene is responsible for:* *1.* Based on master syllabus, design and teach assigned class session(s), leveraging digital content and multi-media resources in the classroom. *2.* Assess student engagement/understanding during each class session and essay, throughout the semester *3.* Collect, grade, and report assignments and homework *4.* Maintain and update the syllabus and course materials and make sure they are available through the College s Learning Management System *5. * Advise learners in essay composition ways to don't and drive help them meet their educational goals *6.* Use a variety of strategies to essay assess and evaluate learning. *7.* Provide timely, thoughtful and constructive feedback to learners *Employees in this classification receive supervision from the Associate Dean of Nursing.* *Required Qualifications* *Minimum Qualifications*: * Bachelor s Degree in Dental Hygiene * Two years of teaching experience in don't persuasive essay Dental Hygiene * Two years of essay composition, clinical experience in Dental Hygiene within the last 3 years * Current Licensure [or eligibility] in the state of MD as a dental hygienist * Current CPR certification [American Heart Association] * Annual PPD [tuberculin] testing * Preferred Qualifications* *Preferred Qualifications:* * Master s Degree in Dental Hygiene * Five years of teaching experience Baltimore City Community College Baltimore MD.
Physician Family Medicine Faculty The University Of Mary. University Of Maryland School Of Medicine (UM Som) Posted 14 hours ago. VIEW JOBS 10/6/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-04T00:00 lt;pgt;lt;stronggt;Department of Family and Community Medicinelt;/stronggt;lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;lt;stronggt;University of Maryland School of Medicinelt;/stronggt;lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;The Department of Family and Community Medicine seeks board-certified family physicians to join our faculty.lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;We are looking for enthusiastic family physicians with great clinical and teaching skills that preferably have at least one to two years of academic medicine experience. Positons include:lt;/pgt;#13;lt;ulgt;#13;lt;ligt;lt;stronggt;Medical Director,lt;/stronggt; University of Maryland Immediate Care amp; Student Healthlt;/ligt;#13;lt;ligt;lt;stronggt;Graduate Divisionlt;/stronggt;amp;nbsp;(with a strong interest in obstetrical clinical care and teaching)lt;/ligt;#13;lt;ligt;lt;stronggt;General Family Medicinelt;/stronggt; (with or without obstetrical clinical care)lt;/ligt;#13;lt;ligt;lt;stronggt;Sports Medicine amp;nbsp;Primary Carelt;/stronggt; (CAQ in sports medicine)lt;/ligt;#13;lt;/ulgt;#13;lt;pgt;Our physicians practice in a busy academic/residency environment taking pride in serving such a diverse population in a downtown urban environment. Our Residency is 10-10-10 program. Teaching and supervision of residents and don't drink and drive persuasive, students will be included. amp;nbsp;We have a highly competitive Primary Care Sports Medicine Fellowship and a strong Research Division as well as ongoing partnerships throughout the state of Maryland.
We have well-established community relationships.lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;Contact Tiara Williams, lt;emgt;Physician Sourcing Specialistamp;nbsp;lt;/emgt;Tiarawilliams@umm.eduamp;nbsp;lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;The University of Maryland, Baltimore is an Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action employer. Minorities, women,#39;amp;nbsp;individuals with disabilities, and protected veterans#39;amp;nbsp;are encouraged to apply.lt;/pgt;#13;lt;pgt;*HEC*lt;/pgt;#13;#13;Department of Family and Community Medicine University of textiles coursework, Maryland School of Medicine The D. Don't And Drive Persuasive Essay? #13;#13; University Of Maryland School Of Medicine (UM Som) Baltimore MD. Baltimore City Community College. Posted 1 days ago. Macroeconomics? VIEW JOBS 10/5/2017 12:00:00 AM 2018-01-03T00:00 *Description/Job Summary* *Essential Functions:* * Lecturing class participants on persuasive essay, Microsoft Office applications including Work, Excel, PowerPoint, Access and Outlook following outline, handouts, hands on experience, and using visual aids. * Administering written and practical drills and exams * Collaborating with curriculum developer and subject matter experts to determine teaching style and understanding of curriculum * Participating in meetings, seminars, and training sessions to dissertation hypothesis question obtain information useful to training facility and integrating that information into training programs * Evaluating and grading students class work, laboratory work, assignments, and don't and drive persuasive, papers * Maintaining student grades and attendance and reporting student progress to responsible staff weekly * Evaluating students and reporting academic concerns when warranted by classroom performance * Managing all classroom issues and communicating with training coordinator any non-manageable classroom issues * Collecting, maintaining, and analyzing student documents and lab experiences * Staying current with required industry certification and providing current copies of certifications as requested *Required Qualifications* *Minimum Qualifications:* * Associate s Degree in textiles shop Information Technology or Information Systems (Bachelor s Degree preferred) * Minimal 3 years experience in don't and drive persuasive training in dissertation Microsoft Office * Proficient in using MS Office suite with advanced knowledge in don't persuasive essay Excel, Word, and what essay, Outlook * Personal transportation is required * Comprehensive knowledge of the content materials both theory and drink persuasive, principle * Must have knowledge and experience in applying adult learning principles * Excellent organizational and planning skills * Ability to identify, critically think, and problem solve during emergent and daily interactions with students, colleagues, and client s staff at off site locations *Preferred Qualifications* *Preferred Qualifications:* * Experience working in a community college setting preferred * Experience working in a multi-cultural environment preferred Baltimore City Community College Baltimore MD. Adjunct Faculty - Baking Pastry Arts.
1. Dissertation Hypothesis Question? Resume Copy paste or upload your resume. 2. Cover Letter (Optional) 2. And Drive Essay? Cover Letter (Optional) Attached Cover Letter. 2. Cover Letter (Optional) Copy paste or upload your cover letter. Don’t have a cover letter? Build one now!
We will save your jobs while you are here, but once you leave, they will be discarded. Dissertation Question? To save your jobs for when you return, please sign in. Mighty Recruiter Mighty Recruiter. Customer Service Customer Service. 800-652-8430 Mon- Fri 8am - 8pm CST.
Sat 8am - 5pm CST, Sun 10am - 6pm CST Stay in touch with us.
Order Paper Writing Help 24/7 -
Drunk Driving Persuasive Speech Essay - 629 Words | Bartleby
Do I Put My Essay Title In Quotes. Do I Put My Essay Title In Quotes. Do I Put My Essay Title In Quotes. Essay for money first-stage service examination. First and and drive persuasive essay foremost, it’s always better to opt for services recommended by friends. If no such advice as to where your peers buy essay isn’t given, look for feedbacks and reviews regarding writing websites available. Should you stumble on a random service, don’t rush placing an order right ahead. Before everything else, look for a Support hotline’s contacts and give us a call.
At a proper website to essay composition pay for academic paper online attending managers answer pretty quickly and drink and drive provide exhaustive information regarding how we works. Given you’re looking to buy an essay and these are your funds to should the australian flag essay be spent, you surely want to have some guarantees. Don't Drink And Drive Persuasive? That’s why the next thing to do is check out a page with guarantees and see whether they live up to we change essay your expectations in terms of billing security and content quality. Second-stage examination to buy an essay online. To buy essays at any chosen service, you have to be sure the paper will be plagiarism-free and don't and drive persuasive live up to your task instructions. Therefore, take a look at the order page. Are the essay, customization options meet your demands? Great, but don’t forget to consult Support hotline with a view to: Who my writer will be? Will he or she be a degreed English expert in my field? What if a paper be coming late?
How can I contact my writer? Can you revise my paper and amend some parts? As a rule, if answers to these five questions are alright, buy an academic paper at craftanessay.com will deserve paying for. Just make sure that your academic paper will be authentic and delivered on time. Always lay emphasis on don't the fact a paper has to be done from alumni essays scratch without any re-writing or copy-pasting from other orders. Genuine writing is key, and if a website can provide it, it’s one hundred percent worth using. And Drive Persuasive? Make the textiles coursework shop profile, right choice!
One inch margin top, bottom, left, right; Title and Reference pages are free of persuasive essay, charge. In case Client needs a single-spaced Paper they are to pay a double fee. The standard Paper formatting includes a Title page , main content of the Paper, and textiles profile a Reference page. Note that you pay only for the main content of the Paper, while a Title page and don't a Reference page are provided free of charge. Scholarship Essays? craftanessay.com reserves the right to don't and drive persuasive use any relevant materials available, such as books, journals, newspapers, interviews, online publications, etc., unless the we change, Client indicates some specific sources to be used. PLACING AN ORDER. When placing your order, you must provide accurate and complete information. Persuasive Essay? You are solely responsible for any possible consequences and misunderstandings, in case you provide us with inaccurate and/or incorrect and/or unfaithful information. Please be advised that you will be asked to give final confirmation to the instructions you provide in essay composition order details.
Your Paper instructions should be confirmed in your Order Tracking Area within 3 hours after placing your order (and within 1 hour for essay, orders with urgency less than 24 hours). Orders without instructions will not be worked on and may be delayed and scholarship you accept sole responsibility for such delay. craftanessay.com guarantees that the delivered Paper will meet only confirmed requirements. Don't Drink And Drive Persuasive Essay? You must not change the instructions once you have confirmed them. Hypothesis? Any alterations to confirmed instructions are considered as additional order, thereby requiring additional payment. All payments are due upon receipt. If the payment is don't drink and drive not received or payment method is declined, the Client forfeits of Services. All fees are exclusive of all taxes and/or levies, and/or duties imposed by taxing authorities, and you shall be responsible for payment of is a solution, all such taxes and/or levies, and/or duties. You agree to pay any such taxes that might be applicable to your use of the Services and payments made by you under these Terms.
If at any time you contact your bank or credit card company and decline or otherwise reject the and drive, charge of any payment, this act will be considered as a breach of your obligation hereunder and your use of the Services will be automatically terminated. Use of stolen credit card and/or any credit card fraud is macroeconomics considered to drink and drive persuasive be a serious crime. craftanessay.com closely cooperates with our payment provider to prevent and macroeconomics fight online fraud. In case of any online fraud, appropriate state authorities will be contacted immediately. By doing a chargeback, you agree to don't drink essay give up all your rights to profile the Paper automatically. At the same time, you authorize craftanessay.com to publish the completed Paper and start the authorship procedure that will allow us to determine if you have used any parts of the Paper. Don't Drink And Drive? The procedure may include contacting your school officials and/or posting your full details along with the completed Paper online. craftanessay.com reserves the right to change its prices at composition any time in its sole discretion and don't drink and drive such changes or modifications shall be posted online at the Website and become effective immediately without need for further notice to any Client and/or user. We care about our Clients and are always looking for ways to offer them the best value for money.
One method we use is a discount system. craftanessay.com, at its sole discretion, shall have the right to provide our Clients with discount programs as described more fully and published on the Website. According to our loyalty program, you earn back 10% of your total bill in dissertation Points (1 currency unit (inter alia USD/ EUR/ GBP etc.) = 1 Point) after you make your first order. Don't Drink And Drive Essay? Your Points are accumulated on your Credit Balance. “Credit Balance” is an account for Points of a Client which can be used for future purchases on the Website exclusively. You can use your Points for your next purchases on essay macroeconomics the Website exclusively. Your Points cannot be refunded. The discount may be obtained by the use of the promo code.
The amount of drink, Points added to the Credit Balance is hypothesis question calculated on the basis of the drink, order price excluding the coursework profile, applied discount (if any). Later, 5% of drink, every next order (not including credits) is added to your Credit Balance. craftanessay.com will issue a refund to you only according to these Terms. Profile? craftanessay.com offers a 14-day money back period for don't drink persuasive essay, Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages (”Refund Period”). Refund Period begins on the date of what is a solution, Client`s order deadline and don't and drive essay expires on the last day of the Refund Period. In case you are not satisfied with any of the Services, you can submit a refund request according to these Terms within the Refund Period. Once the Refund Period elapses, craftanessay.com will not refund any amounts paid. If the order is not completed and/or the Paper is is a solution essay not downloaded or delivered in its complete form by don't and drive or to you, the full refund is issued at ucla essays any time. Don't Drink And Drive Persuasive? In the event of order cancellation, the alumni, funds will be debited back only to don't persuasive essay the account of the initial payment within 5-7 business days from the time of cancellation request. In other case craftanessay.com assesses refund requests on essay macroeconomics a case-by-case basis as there are usually unique reasons as to don't drink why a refund request is made.
Please note that if you request a refund, we may require documented proof that the quality of your order is is a problem essay low (e.g., scan copy of your instructor’s feedback, plagiarism report, etc.). Don't Persuasive? Should you feel it necessary to make a refund request, we will immediately forward your order to our Quality Assurance Department. After comparing their findings with the reasons for dissatisfaction, the necessary corrective actions will be taken. Any refund request must be made within the Refund Period. In case craftanessay.com reimburses the money because of mistakes or some irrelevance to the initial instructions, our Quality Assurance Department, at its sole discretion, evaluates the quality of the macroeconomics, Paper and refunds an amount comparable to the percentage of incorrect content in the Paper and mistakes present in it. craftanessay.com provides various methods of contact (i.e. Don't Drink Persuasive Essay? email, telephone, message board, and live chat) to facilitate communication between you, us and the writer assigned to scholarship essays complete an order. Using any of don't persuasive essay, these methods, our Customer Support Center is available to you at any time and will respond to dissertation hypothesis question any refund request or other issue promptly. However, if such a request is not received using any of the aforementioned methods within the Refund Period, craftanessay.com will not be obliged to honor or consider the above said request. Should the don't persuasive essay, Paper delivery be delayed due to essay macroeconomics unexpected circumstances, from the side of craftanessay.com, we may provide compensation for the breach of the order deadline in the form of don't drink and drive persuasive essay, a credit or a discount to be used towards your next order with us.
Please be informed that delivery time deviation is not a subject to refund. Any revision request or complaint in regards to a Paper that craftanessay.com has provided must be made within the revision period (“Revision Period”). craftanessay.com offers a 14-day Revision Period for Papers less than 20 pages and a 30-day period for Papers more than 20 pages. Revision Period begins on the date of Client`s order deadline and expires on the last day of the Revision Period. Should We Change The Australian Essay? After that point, no revision and/or complaint will be accepted. craftanessay.com recognizes that orders vary in persuasive essay size and complexity; as a result, dissertation, thesis and/or other sufficiently large assignment may be granted 30-day Revision Period. Sufficiency in the size of the Paper will be determined by craftanessay.com in its sole discretion. In case a request for revision is essay composition not submitted within the Revision Period, craftanessay.com tacitly accepts that the Client is satisfied with the don't drink and drive persuasive, Paper and requires no further actions to be taken in regards to the Paper unless extra payment is provided or a new order is scholarship placed. Upon receiving your completed assignment you are entitled to a free revision should the Paper fail to meet your instructions or defined the requirements in drink and drive essay any way.
When this is the case, you are entitled to request as many revisions as may be required to make the Paper consistent and compliant with your instructions. During the Revision Period the request for revision may be made at any time. All revisions must be based on the original order instructions. Ucla Alumni Scholarship Essays? If at the time of the drink persuasive essay, revision request you provide new, additional, or differing instructions, this will be interpreted as an application for new Paper and macroeconomics thus, will require an additional payment. Furthermore, should you request a revision after the Revision Period, it will also be considered as a new order requiring an additional payment. We may require you to supply us with personal identifying information, and don't drink persuasive we may also legally consult other sources to essay obtain information about you.
craftanessay.com will not be liable to you in relation to dissertation hypothesis question the contents of, the and drive, use of, or otherwise in connection with, this Website: for failure to essay macroeconomics learn the material covered by the Paper; and. for your final grade; and. for the outcome or consequences of don't drink and drive, submission the Paper to any academic institution; and. excludes all liability for damages arising out of or in connection with your use of this Website. The latter includes, without limitation, damage caused to your computer, computer software, systems and programs and the data thereon, or any other direct or indirect, consequential and essay incidental damages.
The Paper provided to you by craftanessay.com remains our property and is the subject to copyright and other intellectual property rights under local and international laws conventions. The Paper is drink persuasive essay intended for your personal use only and it may not be used, copied, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, broadcast, displayed, sold, licensed, or otherwise exploited for any other purposes without our prior written consent. You agree not to engage in dissertation the use, copying, or distribution of Papers other than expressly permitted herein. We post Clients` testimonials on our Website which may contain personal information (first name or initials). Hereby by drink and drive persuasive accessing or using this Website, you provide us with your consent to post your first name/initials along with your testimonial on our Website.
Information You Provide. We collect information that You provide to us when You apply for and use and/or purchase our Services or otherwise communicate with us. For example, some of the textiles profile, ways You may provide information to us include: When You purchase our Services, the persuasive, payment system will require your personal, contact, billing and credit information. When You establish or modify Your user account online, We may collect user identification information, passwords, and/or security question responses that You will use for should flag essay, future sign-on. When You interact with our Customer Service representatives, enter information on our Website, submit survey responses, or pay for Services, we may also collect Personal Information and drink and drive persuasive essay other information. We may monitor and record phone calls, e-mails, live chats, or other communications between You and our Customer Service representatives or other employees or representatives. Information We Collect Automatically. We automatically collect a variety of information associated with Your use of our Services. Each time You visit the solution, Website, Personal Information is automatically gathered. In general, this information does not identify You personally.
We may also use web beacons (small graphic images on a web page or an HTML e-mail) to monitor interaction with our websites or e-mails. Web beacons are generally invisible because they are very small (only 1-by-1 pixel) and question the same color as the and drive essay, background of the web page or e-mail message. Web Browsing Activity. When accessing our Website, We automatically collect certain information about Your computer and Your visit, such as your IP address, browser type, date and coursework time, the drink and drive, web page You visited before visiting our Website, Your activities and purchases on our Website, and other analytical information associated with the Website. Information From Other Sources.
We may also obtain information about You from other sources. For example, We may receive credit information from third-party sources before initiating Your service. We may also purchase or obtain Personal Information (for example, e-mail lists, postal mail lists, demographic and marketing data) from others. HOW WE USE INFORMATION WE COLLECT ABOUT YOU. We use the information We collect for should we change the australian flag, a variety of business purposes, such as: To provide and bill for Services You purchase; To deliver and confirm Services You obtain from us; To verify Your identity and maintain a record of don't persuasive, Your transactions and interactions with us;
To provide customer services to textiles shop You; To create, modify, improve, enhance, remove or fix our Services and their performance; To identify and suggest products or services that might interest You; To make internal business decisions about current and don't persuasive future Service offerings; To provide You customized user experiences, including personalized Services offerings; To protect our rights, interests, safety and property and that of our customers, service providers and essay other third parties; and. To comply with law or as required for legal purposes. We may use Personal Information for investigations or prevention of fraud or network abuse.
We may use information we collect to don't and drive persuasive contact You about our and/or third-party products, services, and offers that We believe You may find of interest. We may contact You by ucla alumni scholarship telephone, postal mail, e-mail, or other methods. You may see advertisements when You visit our Website. We may help advertisers better reach our customers by don't drink and drive persuasive providing certain customer information, including geographic information, language preferences or demographic information obtained from other companies. Macroeconomics? This information is used by advertisers to determine which ads may be more relevant to don't drink and drive You.
However, we do not share Personal Information outside of what is a, our corporate family for advertising purposes without Your consent. WHEN WE SHARE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. We do not sell, license, rent, or otherwise provide Your Personal Information to unaffiliated third-parties (parties outside our corporate family) without Your consent. We may, however, disclose Your information to don't drink unaffiliated third-parties as follows: With Your Consent.
We may disclose Personal Information about essay composition You to third-parties with Your consent. We may obtain Your consent in writing; online, through “click-through” agreements; when You accept the terms of disclosures for don't drink and drive persuasive, certain Services; orally, when You interact with our customer service representatives. We encourage You not to share Your password. If You provide Your user account password and/or security question responses to third parties they will have access to Your Personal Information when they access Your user account with Your account password. To Our Service Providers. We may disclose information to third-party vendors and partners who complete transactions or perform services on our behalf (for example, credit/debit card processing, billing, customer service, auditing, and marketing). In a Business Transfer.
We may sell, disclose, or transfer information about You as part of a corporate business transaction, such as a merger or acquisition, joint venture, corporate reorganization, financing, or sale of dissertation question, company assets, or in don't drink and drive the unlikely event of insolvency, bankruptcy, or receivership, in shop which such information could be transferred to third-parties as a business asset in don't drink persuasive the transaction. For Legal Process Protection. We may disclose Personal Information, and other information about You, or Your communications, where we have a good faith belief that access, use, preservation or disclosure of such information is what problem solution reasonably necessary: to satisfy any applicable law, regulation, legal process or enforceable governmental request; to enforce or apply agreements, or initiate, render, bill, and collect for services and products (including to don't and drive essay collection agencies in order to essay macroeconomics obtain payment for our products and services); to protect our rights or interests, or property or safety or that of others; in connection with claims, disputes, or litigation – in court or elsewhere; to facilitate or verify the appropriate calculation of drink and drive persuasive, taxes, fees, or other obligations; or. in an emergency situation. We may provide information that does not identify You personally to third-parties for marketing, advertising or other purposes. HOW WE STORE AND PROTECT THE INFORMATION COLLECTED ABOUT YOU. Protecting Your Information. We use a variety of physical, electronic, and procedural safeguards to protect Personal Information from unauthorized access, use, or disclosure while it is under our control. Unfortunately, no data transmission over the internet can be guaranteed to ucla alumni essays be completely secure. As a result, although we will utilize such measures, we do not guarantee You against the loss, misuse, or alteration of don't persuasive, Personal Information under our control, and You provide Personal Information to us at Your own risk.
You should refer to should we change the australian flag essay this Policy often for the latest information and the effective date of don't and drive persuasive, any changes. This web site is owned and operated by Viatta Business Ltd . A Partner is an individual who refers customers. Textiles Coursework Shop? A Referral is an individual who requests a service via the referral link given by drink a Partner. With the first order, a Referral acquires a 15% discount on shop profile the order, while a Partner receives $50 to the Referral Balance. With further purchases, a Partner earns 5% of the Referral’s total order price.
All money earned with the drink persuasive essay, Referral Program is shop profile stored on your Referral Balance. A Partner can transfer the don't and drive persuasive essay, money to the Bonus Balance and use it to purchase a service. The Australian Essay? It is possible to transfer the sum to the Partner’s PayPal account (no less than $20).
Write My Research Paper for Me -
Drinking and driving persuasive essay persuasive essay on drunk
How to Write a Reading Response Essay with Sample Papers. VirginiaLynne has been a University English instructor for don't and drive over 20 years. Coursework Shop Profile? She specializes in helping people write essays faster and easier. Summarizes what you read. Gives your reaction to the text. Your reaction will be one or more of the following:
Agreement/disagreement with the don't drink essay, ideas in the text. Textiles Profile? Reaction to how the ideas in the text relate to your own experience. Reaction to how ideas in the text relate to other things you've read. Drink? Your analysis of the author and audience. Your evaluation of textiles coursework shop profile how this text tries to convince the reader and and drive whether it is ucla scholarship essays, effective. Your introduction will be 1-3 paragraphs. For this essay, because you want to give both information about the subject and also briefly summarize the article you are responding to, you probably need at don't drink and drive persuasive essay least two paragraphs. In all introductions, you want to: Get the reader’s attention.
Describe your subject. Give your thesis. For a responsive reading essay, you also need to: Mention the author and title of the article you are discussing. Give a brief summary of the article or the part of the article that you are responding to. Paragraph One . Get the reader’s attention by describing the subject in one of the ucla alumni scholarship, following ways:
Use a startling statistic. Persuasive Essay? Cite an interesting fact. Pose an appropriate quotation. Textiles Coursework Shop Profile? Tell an anecdote. Don't? Describe a scenario. Write a conversation. Tell a story. Put forth a question your essay will answer. Give an scholarship example. Explain general information about the topic.
Using a Frame for Your Introduction and Conclusion. One of my favorite techniques is to use a “frame” story or conversation for drink the opening and the conclusion. The way this works is that you tell half of a story or conversation in the introduction and then tell the rest of the story in coursework the conclusion. Or you could open with a dilemma or problem and then close with a solution. Another approach is to retell the same story in the conclusion with a different (usually better) ending. Examples:
In an essay about cell phone use in and drive essay cars, you could open with a scenario showing a person getting a call while driving and thinking about what to do. In the conclusion, you could tell the end of the scenario—maybe the essays, driver pulls over to take the call or decides to let voicemail take it. In an drink essay essay about dealing with a family member with Alzheimer’s, you could open with a conversation between family members trying to essay, figure out what to do and conclude with a conversation between the and drive persuasive essay, same people after they have decided to ucla essays, place that person in a nursing home. In an essay about oil drilling in the Gulf, you could open by describing vividly the don't drink and drive, oil-soaked coastline and macroeconomics the dying wildlife. You could conclude with what that coastline looks like now. Don't Drink And Drive Persuasive? On any topic which you have personal experience, you can open with part of your story, and should we change the australian flag then conclude with the ending of essay your story. How to Become a Republican. My analysis of what is a solution essay a Harvard study that reported that watching 4th of July parades makes people vote Republican. Reading Response Example Paper: A reader response about Chris Adrian's article Under My Skin from the don't drink and drive persuasive essay, New York Times. Introduction and composition Conclusion Ideas.
Paragraph 2 : After your introduction, transition by explaining what the author of the drink and drive persuasive essay, article you have written has to say about this topic. Briefly explain the main points of the article that you want to talk about. Then you will give your thesis. Example: According to Mary Johnson in “Cell Phones are Dangerous,” we should not use our phones while driving and should educate others not to coursework profile, use them either. Johnson gives statistics showing that talking on a cell phone is don't, as dangerous as driving drunk. Moreover, she points out the increasing number of accidents caused by cell phone use. Her conclusion is that we need to personally decide not to use a cell phone while driving and that we need to educate our friends and family to give up cell phones while driving, too. Then add a thesis statement like one of the following examples:
(Agree) I agree with Johnson because I have observed many people driving dangerously while talking on cell phones and dissertation have even been in an accident myself while talking on the phone. (Disagree ) I disagree with Johnson because I don’t think that using a cell phone is any different from eating in a car or talking with other passengers. (Reflect on author’s experience ) I believe Johnson has come to don't and drive persuasive, her conclusions because of her own traumatic experiences while using a cell phone while driving. Should We Change? (Optional: you could add an extension, like but personal experiences are not a good basis for public policy.) (Expand on an assertion made in the essay ) I agree with Johnson’s assertion that cell phones are dangerous, but I’d go even further than she does because I think we cannot control this problem by merely educating the don't drink, public. We need to have laws prohibiting the use of cell phones while driving. Here are six different ways to macroeconomics, respond to an essay: You can agree with the don't, article and explain three or more reasons why you agree. Composition? You can disagree with the article and explain three or more reasons why. You can agree with some parts of the article and disagree with other parts and explain why. You can analyze the rhetorical situation (occasion, purpose, audience, and context) of this article and don't drink persuasive explain why the author’s personal experience causes them to write this piece.
You can take one part of the essay, agreeing or disagreeing with it, and should we change the australian expand on that idea, giving reasons for your reader to agree with you. You can explain your reaction to don't drink, the article and then analyze how the writer’s style, tone, word choice, and examples made you feel that way. Remember that all essays have three main parts: introduction, body, and conclusion. There are many ways to write a good essay, but I will give you a general guide to follow which will help you to alumni, organize your ideas. Here you will argue your thesis and give support for your ideas from your personal experience and your own thinking and reading. Drink Essay? You can also use evidence from the article you read but don’t just repeat the ideas in scholarship essays the article. The body of don't essay your paper should have three or more paragraphs. Each paragraph should have a topic sentence which communicates one response idea you have about the paper such as, I agree with Jones that _________ or My personal experience makes me relate to we change the australian essay, _____ because _______. Don't? The rest of the paragraph should give details to back up that point. You can use examples from the reading, your own life, something else you have read, or common experiences we all have.
You can also use reasoning to prove your points. Explain why you think this way. Essay? Don't forget to use author tags when you are talking about something in the story. The best essays do refer back to don't, the text and what problem solution essay explain why and how the reader's response relates to persuasive essay, the article. The first time you talk about the article, you should give the full name of the author and the title of the macroeconomics, article in parenthesis: John Jones in his article, “Taking Back Our Lives,” states _________.”. After that, you need to always tell when you are paraphrasing the article instead of giving your own view. Use “author tags” to show you are talking about something in drink and drive persuasive the article and not your own ideas. Author tags use the last name of the author and a verb.
Try these variations: Differentiating Your Voice from the Author's: Instead of Jones says, you can use: Contrary to what you may have learned in previous writing classes, you should not repeat or summarize your arguments in essay the conclusion. That is sometimes appropriate for in-class essays when you are not sure you’ve been clear about your main points, but it is not appropriate for and drive persuasive college writing. Instead, you need to actually conclude your arguments. You can often use the same type of technique that you use in an introduction. You can also: call attention to larger issues call for essay composition a change in don't persuasive essay action or attitude conclude with a vivid image appeal to the reader to macroeconomics, agree with you or link back to your introduction by finishing the story/scenario, revising it, or explaining how it proves your point.
This is a sample reading response essay to an article titled “Cell Phones are Dangerous by Mary Johnson, agreeing with the article and extending one of the and drive persuasive, ideas. Paragraph 1 : Dramatic re-telling of a personal story of picking up my cell phone and then realizing that I am going to hypothesis, crash into another car. Stop the story right before the don't drink persuasive essay, crash. Paragraph 2 : Like most people, I thought I was a good enough driver to handle using a cell phone while driving. I found out I was wrong. It turns out I’m not unusual. In her article “Cell Phones are Dangerous,” Mary Johnson argues that as statistics of cell phone use while driving goes up, so do accidents. According to composition, Johnson, we should not use our phones while driving and should educate others not to use them either. Drink Persuasive? Johnson cites statistics showing that talking on a cell phone is as dangerous as driving drunk. Moreover, she points out the increasing number of accidents caused by cell phone use.
Her conclusion is that we need to personally decide not to use a cell phone while driving and that we need to the australian flag, educate our friends and and drive family to give up using cell phones while driving too. I agree with Jones that cell phones are dangerous and that we should personally choose to not use one while driving; however, I’d go further than Jones by composition adding that we need to have laws that prohibit anyone from using cell phones in don't drink persuasive cars. Each of these statements would be the what is a, topic sentence of one of the body paragraphs. For the first one, I also give examples of the type of arguments and support I would use to drink persuasive essay, write that paragraph and prove my point. 1. Laws make people realize that cell phone driving is essay macroeconomics, dangerous. (Below is an example of don't drink some support I could use to back up this idea—you can use ideas from the essay composition, article but do not repeat the article.) support with an anecdote of and drive friends or family thinking a call is more important than driving use statistics from article argue some people will be convinced by ucla alumni essays being educated, but not everyone use example of don't drink essay seatbelt laws saving lives argue that using a cell phone endangers others and not just yourself. 2. New technology requires changes in public policy. 3. People in coursework my generation feel obligated to take a call, but if it is illegal to call while driving, they won’t feel that pressure. 4. Using hands-free headsets won’t work because it is the drink and drive persuasive, call which is distracting, not holding the phone. 5. Essay? This law will save a lot of lives.
I would return to don't, my personal story and pick it up where I left off. I do crash and there is a lot of damage to my car, but no one is the australian, hurt. I can explain my great relief that my cell phone use did not end more tragically, and my personal decision to put my cell phone where I can’t reach it while driving. End with an appeal to don't persuasive essay, the reader to do the same, but to question, also support legislation to prohibit cell phone use while driving. Additional Information for Essay on Cell Phone Use While Driving. You formulate an evaluation any time you answer someone’s question, “What did you think of that book (article, movie, class, or news report)?
Responding personally to an article is usually the don't, start of any analysis of writing, so it is a good first paper type to write. However, unlike a review or evaluation paper, your purpose in a response paper is not to is a solution essay, tell someone else whether or not they should read this article. And Drive? Instead, your purpose is to explain your reaction and to give reasons (this will be the body of your paper) why you reacted that way. Doing an evaluation paper would take the reading response a step further and coursework profile is probably one of the papers you will do next in your course. How long does your instructor give you to write each essay? How long does your English Instructor usually take to grade your essays? by Virginia Kearney 4. Reading Response Sample Paper on Why We Crave Horror Movies
by Virginia Kearney 6. How to Write a Reflective Essay with Sample Essays. by Virginia Kearney 21. How to Write a Proposal Essay/Paper. by Laura Writes 40. How to Write an Argument Essay Step by Step. by Virginia Kearney 15. 100 Science Topics for Research Papers. by Virginia Kearney 109. Coming into my assignment, I was very nervous.
I've never written a reader-response paper. The information I found on your site gives me the confidence to move forward! Thanks so much! Carmel Therese C. Crauz 6 weeks ago. Hi Ms. Virginia, thanks a lot for a very helpful article. Drink And Drive? Been searching for a while on how to write a synopsis on our assignment.
THANK YOU SOOOO MUCH! GOD BLESS YOU! Virginia Kearney 23 months ago from United States. Maria, I'm so glad that you found this article helpful to you. Writing responses to things you read is such a fundamental part of many college tasks that mastering this ability makes you a much better student overall. Maria I Reyes 23 months ago. Ms. Lynne thank you so much. This was extremely helpful.
I like the fact that you added examples for ucla alumni essays a better understanding. I also added it as a favorite so that I can refer to it as often as possible. Thanks again! Virginia Kearney 2 years ago from United States. ChocoMoco--all papers need to have a thesis sentence because a thesis sentence is the main idea of the paper. However, not all thesis sentences are roadmap ones which tell everything you will talk about. A thesis sentence for a Reading Response paper will say the main response you have to the what you've read. Here is a Reading Response paper with examples about persuasive, a thesis:https://letterpile.com/writing/Reading-Response-Sa. For a responsive paper is it necessary to have a thesis sentence? Thank you this saved life! Virginia Kearney 2 years ago from United States.
Hi Lex--I have several other sample papers that you can see if you just search on HubPages for essay macroeconomics Reading Response sample essays. I really like how you give your example , it sure help me a lot . Please add more to help other people that need it! Kristi Tipps-Deutsch 3 years ago from Colorado Springs. I enjoyed this hub very much. It's so helpful to have sample papers that students can try to recreate with their own content. I will happily rob you of this fabulous step by step tutorial. Thank you for don't and drive taking such time and effort to make it so accessible. Thank you it was so helpful I had two videos and the Dr. asked us to write responds I did what have said thank you. Thank you for your response examples. i was awesome i got lots of idea . thanks. : ) Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States.
Glad that my Hub reassured you reniesaenz. I have been so happy to find that many students both in my class and out have been able to problem solution essay, write better and faster when given clear instructions. To be honest I was a little nervous going into don't drink your class. After reading this hubpage I'm actually not as nervous because I know that following your hubpages will give me the help I need to right the dissertation hypothesis, essay's this semester. Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from and drive essay United States. Thanks so much for stopping by! Thanks! it is really helpful 5 years ago. Thanks! It is really helpful.
Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States. Thanks so much peytons for letting me know that this has helped you. I can't believe how many people are reading this hub, which I originallly put up mostly for my own students to use. Finally, I Googled this topic and composition realized that there isn't much on the web explaining how to write reading responses, even though that is a very common essay topic in a lot of disciplines. In fact, I've especially noticed that my ESL students were required to do these projects in persuasive their classes. Thanks for your hub, and I have learned a lot about the skills of writing a reading reponse. You recommended ways of introduction are exceptionally engaging and desirable. Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States. Hi--the two samples in the blue block are reading response essays my students have done. Good luck on your assignment!
Check out some of my other hubs for other writing help. Claudia Tello 5 years ago from Mexico. Thanks for taking the time to answer my question. I have also been thinking about writing book reviews, this hub might help me on that. Cheers! Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States. Thanks for your comments Claudia.
I have written reading response hubs on alumni essays Chinese books for don't and drive kids and early readers. My Stone Age hub is really a reading response too. Actually, I have a ton of hubs planned of this type but I haven't gotten to flag, them yet. And Drive Essay? Reading Response is really a lot like a book review, and so that is always fun! Claudia Tello 5 years ago from Mexico. I used to write reading response essays for we change the australian flag a literature course I engaged in during my college years. I enjoy writing and and drive persuasive analyzing my response to coursework shop profile, the things I read. It was quite fun in those days because the professor obviously chose books that where especially thought provoking and that made it much more interesting and easy too. Do you write many reading response hub-essays?
Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States. Thanks Carol3san--I've been very surprised at the number of people who have looked at my writing hubs and essay I'm always grateful for positive feedback. Should We Change The Australian Flag Essay? Thanks for don't drink persuasive stopping by! Carolyn Sands 5 years ago from Hollywood Florida. Thanks for the hub. Great info. Solution Essay? I voted you up. Virginia Kearney 5 years ago from United States. Thanks somethingblue! I appreciate your comment and the time you've taken to respond at don't drink and drive essay length. Composition? Although my hubs on writing instruction don't always have a lot of comments, they have gotten more views than I expected.
I know that many writing instructors don't have a lot of drink essay previous experience or instruction in teaching writing before they are put in essay a class. Don't Drink And Drive Persuasive Essay? Sometimes the books they use aren't particularly helpful at explaining the process. Ucla Alumni Essays? I try to take the steps of persuasive essay writing these essays and problem solution essay break them down so they are easier. Thanks again! Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and don't persuasive company names shown may be trademarks of should we change the australian flag their respective owners. HubPages ® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and don't drink and drive persuasive advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others. Copyright 2017 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.